She filed a fundamental rights and defamation suits against Natasha-Akpoti at the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court, following sexual harassment claims against her husband.
In the suits, Anoma sought N250 billion as general damages.
Natasha-Akpoti had claimed that Akpabio was victimizing her in the Senate because she refused to sleep with him.
She recounted how the Senate President made several s#xual overtures at her, even in the presence of her husband.
But, Anioma had dismissed her claims, saying she was lying and creating contents for her personal gains.
Addressing a press conference yesterday, Anioma threatened legal actions against Natasha.
The fundamental rights suit (Suit No: CV/814/25), was brought under Section 34(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Article 4 & 5 of The African Charter on Human And Peoples Rights (Ratification And Enforcement Act) Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
Mrs. Akpabio sought the following, “A DECLARATION that the allegations made by the Respondent on the floor of the Senate on the 20th of February 2025 and subsequent scandalous and salacious allegations on Arise News TV by the Respondent, constitute a flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the Applicant guaranteed under Section 34(1) (A) of The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended), Article 4 & 5 of The African Charter on Human And Peoples Rights (Ratification And Enforcement Act) Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and Section 14 of the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015.
“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent from making further inciteful, scandalous, and spiteful statements that have caused the Applicant and her children emotional and psychological abuse and living under constant threat and fear of their lives.
“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent, whether by themselves, their agents, privies, or whosoever from further inciteful, scandalous, and spiteful statements that have caused the Applicant and her children emotional and psychological abuse and living under constant threat and fear of their lives or in any other manner infringing on their fundamental rights.
“AN ORDER awarding the sum of N250,000,000,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Billion Naira only) as exemplary, punitive, aggravated and general damages against the Respondent for her infringement of the fundamental rights of the Applicant alongside such further or other Orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance.”
Additionally, in a separate defamation lawsuit (Suit No: CV/816/25), Mrs. Akpabio seeks: “A DECLARATION that the Defendant’s act of claiming on national television, that the Claimant’s husband, who is the President of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria made sexual advances at her, without any proof of same, has damaged the reputation of the Claimant and indeed her entire family, bringing them into disrepute and opprobrium.
“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT mandating the Defendant to issue a formal written retraction of the defamatory words and tender an unconditional apology to the Claimant and her family, to be published in 2 (two) nationally-read newspapers to wit: The Guardian and This Day Newspapers.
“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT compelling the Defendant to pay to the Claimant the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira only) as punitive and exemplary damages for the ruinous effect of the Defendant’s defamatory words on the Claimant’s family’s reputation.
“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Defendant from further uttering any defamatory words or causing to be uttered or spread, any defamatory words against the reputation of the Claimant’s family.”
Natasha-Akpoti had claimed that Akpabio was victimizing her in the Senate because she refused to sleep with him.
She recounted how the Senate President made several s#xual overtures at her, even in the presence of her husband.
But, Anioma had dismissed her claims, saying she was lying and creating contents for her personal gains.
Addressing a press conference yesterday, Anioma threatened legal actions against Natasha.
The fundamental rights suit (Suit No: CV/814/25), was brought under Section 34(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Article 4 & 5 of The African Charter on Human And Peoples Rights (Ratification And Enforcement Act) Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
Mrs. Akpabio sought the following, “A DECLARATION that the allegations made by the Respondent on the floor of the Senate on the 20th of February 2025 and subsequent scandalous and salacious allegations on Arise News TV by the Respondent, constitute a flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the Applicant guaranteed under Section 34(1) (A) of The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended), Article 4 & 5 of The African Charter on Human And Peoples Rights (Ratification And Enforcement Act) Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and Section 14 of the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015.
“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent from making further inciteful, scandalous, and spiteful statements that have caused the Applicant and her children emotional and psychological abuse and living under constant threat and fear of their lives.
“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent, whether by themselves, their agents, privies, or whosoever from further inciteful, scandalous, and spiteful statements that have caused the Applicant and her children emotional and psychological abuse and living under constant threat and fear of their lives or in any other manner infringing on their fundamental rights.
“AN ORDER awarding the sum of N250,000,000,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Billion Naira only) as exemplary, punitive, aggravated and general damages against the Respondent for her infringement of the fundamental rights of the Applicant alongside such further or other Orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance.”
Additionally, in a separate defamation lawsuit (Suit No: CV/816/25), Mrs. Akpabio seeks: “A DECLARATION that the Defendant’s act of claiming on national television, that the Claimant’s husband, who is the President of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria made sexual advances at her, without any proof of same, has damaged the reputation of the Claimant and indeed her entire family, bringing them into disrepute and opprobrium.
“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT mandating the Defendant to issue a formal written retraction of the defamatory words and tender an unconditional apology to the Claimant and her family, to be published in 2 (two) nationally-read newspapers to wit: The Guardian and This Day Newspapers.
“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT compelling the Defendant to pay to the Claimant the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira only) as punitive and exemplary damages for the ruinous effect of the Defendant’s defamatory words on the Claimant’s family’s reputation.
“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Defendant from further uttering any defamatory words or causing to be uttered or spread, any defamatory words against the reputation of the Claimant’s family.”
from dailypost
Mo foooo!
ReplyDeleteNatasha had enough of his nonsense. Just wish she had a recording of any of their conversations before going public. You can't ask DSS to provide phone conversations that has the Senate President involved.
DeleteMtcheeww
ReplyDeleteI think she's had issues with Natasha in the past. This is embarrassing.
ReplyDeleteI can Never be caught doing such.
ReplyDeleteI can't go viral because I dey defend man over woman matter. Meanwhile they know the truth o,they know what their husbands are capable of o.
Anyway she wants her 10 minutes of fame too.
Not fame, she is defending her meal ticket. They may have forced her to go this route in order to secure her marriage to the he-goat . She doesn't want anything to happen to her position as the number three woman in the country
DeleteGod no go gree
DeleteGod forbid
Can never be me
She knows the truth but she’s shameless
DeleteFan Emmanuel
It's ridiculous. Why can't the husband sue if what Natasha allegations are false? Why is she the one bearing the shame for the husband? We women need to do better abeg
Deleten u expect her to watch her family name being drag to the mud n do nothing
Deletewell it can never be u anyway
The owner of the name na coward? so na the wife be voltron?
DeleteThe owner of the name na coward? so na the wife be voltron?
DeleteAll these ridiculous amounts they keep mentioning makes their lawsuit very laughable .
ReplyDeleteWhat a comic relief .
Nkan mbe π³π π
ReplyDeleteAkpabio's wife is the kind of women that will support their husband in a case of sexual assault even if the truth is glaring until it happens to their daughter.
ReplyDeleteEven if it happens to their daughter, most will cover it up, threaten the girl or disown her and pick their marriage instead.
DeleteMadam go Sidon..e no consignee you..
ReplyDeleteNa ex lovers matter be this..no put mouth
Excuse me, ex what?
DeleteDoes this akpansi use condom? Or they don't care just collect money no matter what we share for each other. God abeg save your children from this evil men.
ReplyDeleteMadam remove yourself from this matter. This is how that woman was busy defending her husband till DNA shut her up.
ReplyDeleteMen are not babies that needs another to defend them
Misplaced loyalty and voltron, madam if na you e go defend you like this ?
DeleteMisplaced loyalty and voltron, madam if na you e go defend you like this ?
DeleteBut does she even have the locus standi to sue somebody on behalf of her adult sane husband? Lawyers shud fear God naa, they just want to collect her money. The allegations were against her husband, if he feels bad abt them let him sue.
ReplyDeleteThe suits are dead on arrival.
DeleteActors guild of 9ja issued a statement that they are investigating the blog allegations of sen akpabio & Nollywood actresses, Emeka Rollas, where's your report.
DeleteIt's fundamental rights matter so she does under FREP.
DeleteThis woman funny wallahi, she knows her husband very well oo, but see how she dey defend am, kai women. This is so embarrassing.
ReplyDeleteDays of the SUEYERs.
ReplyDeleteThe most unserious country I know, always arguing or fighting over prick and toto matter. Akpabio vs Natasha’s, burnt boy vs Sophie, very unserious set of people, una no dey tired
ReplyDeleteWe are not tired of toto mata,we are tired of your smelling English.
DeleteWife of the year
ReplyDeleteShe go regret her action later..
ReplyDeleteMadam defender weldone
Defending who no care.
Regret what? That woman knows exactly what she is married to. She knows the househelp and all the relatives and friends he has mounted. She knows everything!
DeleteThe suit is one of them false attempts at saving face. They have a social standing and need to at least put a show forward. She still needs to go to lunch and he needs to go to the clubs. It’s all for show.
She go regret her action later..
ReplyDeleteMadam defender weldone
Defending who no care.
The foolery
ReplyDeleteEveryone knows the man is a He- goat but as usual they will throw the woman under the bus. Wife Enablers they condone nonsense just to remain married to a animal in human skin. Who no know go know. Politicians and hiding the truth. Madam go sit down one place leave your husband to dance to his own music.
ReplyDeleteWish more women would step to support Natasha. President Tinubu, rise up! Put him on leave while the Akpabio-Gate is investigated. Let this be a warning. Down Akpabio! Down!!!!!!! Your friend’s wife oh!!! Nigerians , women come together, take Akpabio down!!!
ReplyDeleteThis one and Tunde ayenis wife are on the same WhatsApp group
ReplyDeleteLols nkea ato m personally, Mrs Akpa continue...π€£π€£π€£
ReplyDeleteThis woman no get sense sha. Is your husband dumb to defend himself? Him no get money take lawyer ni???? Why involve yourself in a mess you did not create??
ReplyDeleteOwner of name no care to protect am na you be defender!! Olugbeja, well done
Defending what you know is true, that one consign her
ReplyDeleteA closed mouth is a closed bank account π ππ€£
ReplyDeleteSee rubbish
ReplyDelete