The presiding judge, Kehinde Ogundare, in his ruling, held that Jude Nnam, the plaintiff, failed to provide credible evidence to prove the copyright infringement allegation.
Aside from the suit dismissal, Ogundare also awarded a punitive cost of N1 million against Nnam.
Nnam, a composer, in a lawsuit in 2021 had claimed Kcee secretly added his songs including ‘Som Too Chukwu’, ‘Otito Diri Chineke’ and ‘K’ Anyi Jee N’ Ulo Chukwu’ to his album.
Nnam argued that Kcee added his musical projects to ‘Cultural Praise Vol. 1’ without his consent.
The composer sought a written or oral declaration that the three defendants jointly infringed on his copyright by producing and marketing it without his permission.
He also sought that the defendants pay all royalties from the songs and stop further infringement.
Nnam further sought a damage fee of N500 million from the defendants as well as N5 million as the cost of action.
However, KCee and E-Money denied all the plaintiff’s allegations. They also described Nnam’s claims as “frivolous” and an attempt to extort them.
Aside from the suit dismissal, Ogundare also awarded a punitive cost of N1 million against Nnam.
Nnam, a composer, in a lawsuit in 2021 had claimed Kcee secretly added his songs including ‘Som Too Chukwu’, ‘Otito Diri Chineke’ and ‘K’ Anyi Jee N’ Ulo Chukwu’ to his album.
Nnam argued that Kcee added his musical projects to ‘Cultural Praise Vol. 1’ without his consent.
The composer sought a written or oral declaration that the three defendants jointly infringed on his copyright by producing and marketing it without his permission.
He also sought that the defendants pay all royalties from the songs and stop further infringement.
Nnam further sought a damage fee of N500 million from the defendants as well as N5 million as the cost of action.
However, KCee and E-Money denied all the plaintiff’s allegations. They also described Nnam’s claims as “frivolous” and an attempt to extort them.
Ndi nkem chukwu telu mmanu nso.😍
ReplyDelete#ITISTOOLATETOFAIL#😎
Wow
ReplyDeleteCan imagine that
God dey for them ooo..
Hello iya Boys
That’s wrong. They copied /sampled that song
ReplyDeleteCourt said Plaintiff did adduce credible evidence to prove the allegation. If that is so, the verdict is well founded. And it’s not so, Plaintiff has a right to appeal to a higher court. That’s how law works.
DeleteDidn’t
DeleteBut it's actually copyright, just that what money cannot do doesn't exist.
ReplyDeleteI don't like how the real owner of the song took the matter too far but it doesn't change the fact that they copied his song.