Omo Brish dragged Ojo to the Federal High Court of Lagos in a suit No: FHC/L/CS/2508/2023 seeking an injunction to stop her from streaming the movie on IbakaTv App and Ibaka Tv.com
In the suit, Abiola is the Plaintiff/Applicant, while Ojo is the Defendant and 1st respondent and Ibaka Entertainment Limited, is the 2nd Respondent.
Court documents and Affidavit deposed to by Alfred Temitayo Ogunti of the Law firm of Habeeb Oredola and Associates showed that the plaintiff/applicant (Abiola) conceptualized the idea of financing a movie to be produced in Nigeria and shared the idea with the 1st Defendant/Respondent (Ojo) after which the parties agreed to the movie “Under the Carpet’ with the arrangement that the Applicant, as the creator and financier of the movie, will be credited as the “Executive Producer” while Ojo, who is an Influencer in the movie industry in Nigeria will be named as the Producer of the movie.
According to court papers, to the chagrin of Abiola, Ojo, after the production of the movie credited and represented herself as the Executive Producer and the Producer of the movie, thereby attributing the exclusive authorship, ownership, and intellectual property rights in the movie solely to herself contrary to the agreement between the parties on co-ownership and attribution right.
Furthermore, it was alleged that Ojo without the full consent of Abiola organized a premiere and subsequently released the movie to the cinemas. Neither was the applicant credited as Executive Producer nor did the 1st Respondent render accounts of the revenue generated by the movie at the box office to the applicant despite persistent demands.
The Affidavit also showed that Ojo, without the consent of Abiola and on the alleged deliberate misrepresentation that she is both the Executive Producer and the Producer of the movie, has entered into an agreement with the 2nd Defendant/Respondent (Ibaka Entertainment Limited) for the streaming of the movie on the IbakaTv App and Ibaka Tv.com which are streaming platforms owned by the 2nd Respondent, which is accessible to millions of viewers in 220 countries around the world.
The streaming of the movie on the 2nd Respondent’s platform is planned to commence on 8 December 2023.
Abiola contended that the display of the movie by the 2nd Respondent on its streaming platform without the authorization and/or proper credit to the Applicant as the Executive Producer of the movie would occasion a global derogatory effect and constitute irreversible damage to her right of attribution and severe breach of her intellectual property rights.
Abiola argued that there is an imminent risk that the applicant’s co-ownership right will continue to be permanently exploited by the respondents without the possibility of an adequate remedy in monetary terms.
In light of the happenings, Abiola is seeking an order of interlocutory injunction restraining Ojo and Ibaka Entertainment Limited by themselves, their servants, agents, privies, assigns or any other person howsoever described from streaming and/or distributing the movie titled “Under the Carpet” on the Ibaka TV app and Ibaka TV.com either directly or indirectly or on any other online Platform pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
She also sought an order of interlocutory injunction restraining Ojo by herself, her agents, privies, or any other person howsoever described from advertising, promoting, and/or performing acts calculated to promote or represent her as the sole owner of the copyright in the movie tided “Under the Carpet”’ pending the hearing and determination of this Suit.
The Plaintiff further sought an order of interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant/Respondent either by herself, agents, staff, members, or privies howsoever named from interfering in any way howsoever with the subject matter of this Suit or at all, pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
Court documents and Affidavit deposed to by Alfred Temitayo Ogunti of the Law firm of Habeeb Oredola and Associates showed that the plaintiff/applicant (Abiola) conceptualized the idea of financing a movie to be produced in Nigeria and shared the idea with the 1st Defendant/Respondent (Ojo) after which the parties agreed to the movie “Under the Carpet’ with the arrangement that the Applicant, as the creator and financier of the movie, will be credited as the “Executive Producer” while Ojo, who is an Influencer in the movie industry in Nigeria will be named as the Producer of the movie.
According to court papers, to the chagrin of Abiola, Ojo, after the production of the movie credited and represented herself as the Executive Producer and the Producer of the movie, thereby attributing the exclusive authorship, ownership, and intellectual property rights in the movie solely to herself contrary to the agreement between the parties on co-ownership and attribution right.
Furthermore, it was alleged that Ojo without the full consent of Abiola organized a premiere and subsequently released the movie to the cinemas. Neither was the applicant credited as Executive Producer nor did the 1st Respondent render accounts of the revenue generated by the movie at the box office to the applicant despite persistent demands.
The Affidavit also showed that Ojo, without the consent of Abiola and on the alleged deliberate misrepresentation that she is both the Executive Producer and the Producer of the movie, has entered into an agreement with the 2nd Defendant/Respondent (Ibaka Entertainment Limited) for the streaming of the movie on the IbakaTv App and Ibaka Tv.com which are streaming platforms owned by the 2nd Respondent, which is accessible to millions of viewers in 220 countries around the world.
The streaming of the movie on the 2nd Respondent’s platform is planned to commence on 8 December 2023.
Abiola contended that the display of the movie by the 2nd Respondent on its streaming platform without the authorization and/or proper credit to the Applicant as the Executive Producer of the movie would occasion a global derogatory effect and constitute irreversible damage to her right of attribution and severe breach of her intellectual property rights.
Abiola argued that there is an imminent risk that the applicant’s co-ownership right will continue to be permanently exploited by the respondents without the possibility of an adequate remedy in monetary terms.
In light of the happenings, Abiola is seeking an order of interlocutory injunction restraining Ojo and Ibaka Entertainment Limited by themselves, their servants, agents, privies, assigns or any other person howsoever described from streaming and/or distributing the movie titled “Under the Carpet” on the Ibaka TV app and Ibaka TV.com either directly or indirectly or on any other online Platform pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
She also sought an order of interlocutory injunction restraining Ojo by herself, her agents, privies, or any other person howsoever described from advertising, promoting, and/or performing acts calculated to promote or represent her as the sole owner of the copyright in the movie tided “Under the Carpet”’ pending the hearing and determination of this Suit.
The Plaintiff further sought an order of interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant/Respondent either by herself, agents, staff, members, or privies howsoever named from interfering in any way howsoever with the subject matter of this Suit or at all, pending the hearing and determination of this suit.
from pmnewsnigeria
So much for friendship 🙄🙄🙄
ReplyDeleteIyabo, needs to tackle her PR. She’s currently in a good position to develop a worthy brand. She needs to stop portraying herself as an agbero. She claimed on Toke’s podcast that she’s an ajebutter. So why is she always fighting like an agbero? Iyabo watch it before all this bad press messes up your relationship with Paul O!
DeleteShe built her online brand without Paul O. The last statement no follow abeg.
DeleteLol @ajebutter. She wanted to be looked upon the way people see Chioma.
DeleteSadly; somethings are in the blood. She didn't need that fake see me as ajebutter. Why fake what can be real?
Simply own up your ghetto. Or better still; shut up and let your actions mirror your fantasies.
Manu woes of iyabo, what's really happening? Why are so many people having issues with her? I think she really needs to check herself
ReplyDeletePeople can have problems with you when you're standing for the truth. Queen mother as we all know is an activist who's always fighting for the less privedge. Most Yoruba actors started hating on her since the day she stood for justice against the rapist called ijesha and ensured he was senrenced.
DeleteYes.The Baba Ijesha issue is a sore point for many of them. And this goes to show how horrible our perception of rape and child molestation is. We believe we should take it in our stride and move on. All the same, we need Iyabo to come out with her side because it is not a good look for her to be seen as someone lacking integrity and exploiting her friends.
DeleteIyabo Ojo is always in the news these day. I hope that they resolve this amicably. Dialogue is the way out.
ReplyDeleteHmmm...drama here and there
ReplyDeletethis is alot ...
ReplyDeleteHmmmmmm
ReplyDeleteWahala
Wahala be like.........
ReplyDeleteThey should settle themselves.
I hate it when friends fight.
End of the year dragging for iyabo ojo..its been a long time comong
ReplyDeleteWahala pro max
ReplyDeleteYou people should leave the Queen mother alone o
Hmmmm
ReplyDeleteWell, she will have to tender her evidence that the movie is her IP and how she financed the movie. People need to learn to sign contracts. It's possible the plaintiff did not keep her own part of the deal and let Iyabo do all the work + fund the movie. Let's wait for more facts.
ReplyDeleteShe was the one that leaked iyabo conversation with dino melaye.
ReplyDeleteAbi. This is what she should have done in the first place instead of trying to take her own pound of flesh by leaking Iyabo's relationship with Dino; indirectly letting us know that her mother had some mental issue and something about not buying a car for her PR. I hope Tosin has some documentation to back it up because the lawyers and auditors will always tell you that what is not on paper never happened.
DeleteIyabo don dey turn to Lizzy Anjorin small small.
ReplyDeleteHmmmmmm Iyabo this negative news on u it no long palatable
ReplyDelete