Chairman of the Tribunal, Justice Simon Tsammani, while reserving judgment, said that the date of its delivery would be communicated to parties in the dispute.
The major petitioner, Atiku, asked the Tribunal to do substantial justice to his petition and not technical judgment that may pervert the course of Justice.
He insisted that Tinubu be disqualified on the strength of the American Court judgment where he was made to forfeit $460,000 on narcotics and money laundering-related offences.
Atiku’s final address was adopted by his lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche SAN.
However, counsel to the All Progressives Congress, APC, Lateef Fagbemi SAN, urged the Court to dismiss the arguments on the ground that the purported judgement was delivered over 30 years ago.
On his own part, President Tinubu, represented by legal luminary Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN, canvassed that the petition be dismissed because the grievances of Atiku and PDP are targeted at the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC.
from Daily post
Tribunal do the needful, eyes are watching.
ReplyDeleteThe ones I don't understand are the ones posing as political leaders here. A business premises to them is a political house, like they don't know where government house is.
ReplyDeleteWhoever should use common sense.
You mean those that couldn't even tell the difference between being an opposition or enemy of the country.
DeleteYou too dey worry, anon.
Is this man still the “alternative president”? There is something unsavoury about watching someone’s blind quest for power. It doesn’t look like ambition, it looks sinister and unhinged.
ReplyDelete