A Canadian court ordered that the three children be returned to Nigeria after concluding they were wrongfully retained by their mother.
Peoples Gazette quoted part of the court judgment delivered by Justice Engelking as saying, “I find that this court does not have jurisdiction to make a parenting order with respect to these children. I find that they were wrongfully removed from their habitual residence in Nigeria and that they were wrongfully retained in Ontario thereafter.”
It was reported that Olubukola who cited domestic violence in her marriage and affinity with the LGBTQIA, had prayed the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to grant her sole custody of her three children whom she had taken from Nigeria without the consent of their father, Eyitope Ajayi.
It was gathered that in 2016, Eyitope and Olubukola, who both possess Canadian and Nigerian citizenship got married in Nigeria and therein built their family. But their marital woes started after the wife developed issues regarding her s#xual identity, with claims of being as#xual.
Upon her return to Nigeria from birthing their last child in Canada, Olubukola asked her husband for separation. However, while Eyitope was on a business trip, she flew all three children to Canada without his knowledge and consent on November 19, 2021.
In the application for sole custody of her children, Olubukola claimed that the children would suffer “psychological harm” if they were “removed from her care” and returned to Nigeria.
She claimed she would be denied custody of the children by Nigerian courts, whose laws do not favour persons of dissenting s#xual orientations, “based on her to her affinity to or linkage with the LGBTQIIA+ community.” She referenced the Same S#x Marriage Prohibition Act (SSMPA) enacted in 2013 to buttress her claim.
She also expressed fear that “returning to Nigeria because of domestic violence perpetrated on her by Eyitope,” citing their eldest child witnessed an incident when his father was abusive.
Justice Engelking in his ruling dismissed Olubukola’s claims, reminding her that she left her two older children in Eyitope’s care for six months when she travelled to Canada to birth their last child in the company of her mother-in-law.
According to him, if Eyitope was as abusive as she claimed, she would not have entrusted them to his care.
On s#xual stigmatisation, Justice Engelking held that the Same S#x Prohibition Act does not apply to her since she claimed to be as#xual, a s#xual identity that does not involve an amorous relationship with the same s#x. He also allayed her fears that “no prosecution under that Act has ever occurred in the over eight years it has been in existence.”
Taking the arguments of both parties into consideration, Justice Engelking declared that the three children “were wrongfully removed to, and wrongfully retained in, Ontario by the Applicant/Mother, Olubukola Ajayi, pursuant to section 40 of the Children’s Law Reform Act.
“They shall be immediately returned to their habitual residence in Lagos, Nigeria pursuant to section 40 of the Children’s Law Reform Act and in accordance with the terms of this Order.”
“In the event of the Applicant/Mother decline to travel with the children to Nigeria, arrangements shall be made for the Respondent/Father to travel to Canada to retrieve the children and take them back to Nigeria.”
LGBTQIA pertains collectively to people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (or those questioning their gender identity or sexual orientation), intersex, and asexual (or their allies).
Peoples Gazette quoted part of the court judgment delivered by Justice Engelking as saying, “I find that this court does not have jurisdiction to make a parenting order with respect to these children. I find that they were wrongfully removed from their habitual residence in Nigeria and that they were wrongfully retained in Ontario thereafter.”
It was reported that Olubukola who cited domestic violence in her marriage and affinity with the LGBTQIA, had prayed the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to grant her sole custody of her three children whom she had taken from Nigeria without the consent of their father, Eyitope Ajayi.
It was gathered that in 2016, Eyitope and Olubukola, who both possess Canadian and Nigerian citizenship got married in Nigeria and therein built their family. But their marital woes started after the wife developed issues regarding her s#xual identity, with claims of being as#xual.
Upon her return to Nigeria from birthing their last child in Canada, Olubukola asked her husband for separation. However, while Eyitope was on a business trip, she flew all three children to Canada without his knowledge and consent on November 19, 2021.
In the application for sole custody of her children, Olubukola claimed that the children would suffer “psychological harm” if they were “removed from her care” and returned to Nigeria.
She claimed she would be denied custody of the children by Nigerian courts, whose laws do not favour persons of dissenting s#xual orientations, “based on her to her affinity to or linkage with the LGBTQIIA+ community.” She referenced the Same S#x Marriage Prohibition Act (SSMPA) enacted in 2013 to buttress her claim.
She also expressed fear that “returning to Nigeria because of domestic violence perpetrated on her by Eyitope,” citing their eldest child witnessed an incident when his father was abusive.
Justice Engelking in his ruling dismissed Olubukola’s claims, reminding her that she left her two older children in Eyitope’s care for six months when she travelled to Canada to birth their last child in the company of her mother-in-law.
According to him, if Eyitope was as abusive as she claimed, she would not have entrusted them to his care.
On s#xual stigmatisation, Justice Engelking held that the Same S#x Prohibition Act does not apply to her since she claimed to be as#xual, a s#xual identity that does not involve an amorous relationship with the same s#x. He also allayed her fears that “no prosecution under that Act has ever occurred in the over eight years it has been in existence.”
Taking the arguments of both parties into consideration, Justice Engelking declared that the three children “were wrongfully removed to, and wrongfully retained in, Ontario by the Applicant/Mother, Olubukola Ajayi, pursuant to section 40 of the Children’s Law Reform Act.
“They shall be immediately returned to their habitual residence in Lagos, Nigeria pursuant to section 40 of the Children’s Law Reform Act and in accordance with the terms of this Order.”
“In the event of the Applicant/Mother decline to travel with the children to Nigeria, arrangements shall be made for the Respondent/Father to travel to Canada to retrieve the children and take them back to Nigeria.”
LGBTQIA pertains collectively to people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (or those questioning their gender identity or sexual orientation), intersex, and asexual (or their allies).
from sahara reporters
*Chei, her case was weak!
she should have just settled with the hubby so that she can stay on with the kids in Canada...
So she wants to be a lesbian and still wants to retain her kids.she is not serious at all.mtschw
ReplyDeleteTutu
This is how you people fail your tests and exams, and blame "village people"...whereas your problem lies with not reading, and truly comprehending.
DeleteThe article never mentioned her being a lesbian. The woman identifies as 'asexual', which means she experiences little or no sexual attraction to others.
Madam or Oga, try dey read, e go help you for life. She is Asexual.
DeleteRead. Just try it.
DeleteSo you mean a lesbian can't take care of children?
DeleteThey could have settled this amicably. I hope their father is ready to care for them and not dump the with maids or their grandma. It's very strange to separate kids from their mum unless they are no longer very young and indicated interest in living with their dad. There is more to this story.
DeleteEven as an Asexual, you don't have the right to keep a child/children you birthed with someone else when you were sexual. Confused people.
DeleteThe judge was wearing about one thing and that is leaving your kids with an abusive father is not a sign that you think he’s not abusive
ReplyDeleteSee them. If it was the man that claimed the women was abusive in a bid to take her kids permanently away from her, would you have said this same thing?
DeleteBecause she birthed them is not a sign that she isn’t abusive.
Numero uno, sense dey ya head.
DeleteDouble loss
ReplyDeleteVery weak case,I pity the kids in all these mess.
ReplyDeleteYep! The judge trashed all the main issues.
DeleteThe judge no send mehnnn
DeleteI like the part where he or she mentioned the fact that our so-called law on the aphabet people have never been executed since it's enactment.
DeleteCase closed. She should embrace the court ruling in good fate.
ReplyDeleteShe looks sick.
ReplyDeleteThe sickos have added I and A to their LGBTQ tag. Dem mad reach 😏
Good call. You just don’t abscond with kids when their father is still alive or not abusive towards them
ReplyDeleteVery good call, she was trying to play smart.
DeleteShe thought the justice will just side her on hearing her lgbtq persecution claims.
But u see a lot of bvs saying for this reason it the other they want 5o leave the country silently with the children. And their father won't know
DeleteLgtbqiabcd1-10+ in the mud
ReplyDeleteShe wants to teach those innocent children immorality, thank God for this credible judgement that was passed.
ReplyDeleteRead again! She is asexual!
DeleteBut since the kids are Canadians, why do they need to be removed from Canada?
ReplyDeleteTheir Father is in Nigeria. He has the right to them too. She should have gone for custody during holidays. She would have gotten a more favourable judgment if she was in Nigeria. Following the narrative. we can presume all the children are between 1years - 6years (as they married in 2016). Nigerian courts would have given her custody of the children.
DeleteSame question I had in mind
DeleteBecause their father did not give consent for them to be taken to Nigeria.
DeleteDisadvantage of sending children abroad. We need to be prayerful.
ReplyDeleteNext time ask the father for permission. See as you lose. It is well
ReplyDeleteDisadvantage of sending children abroad. We need to be prayerful.
ReplyDeleteSome people who never stepped out of Nigeria are also in the group.
DeleteI’m sorry but I wonder the type of child , Justice Ipaye will birth. She was my lecturer at Lasulaws and she was so harsh and rude. The first time I went to her court when she was a judge she is so pompous and rude. Though not happy that the child is being take. From the daughter, that’s the worst thing that can happen to a mother. May God give her peace and restore love and joy to her home. Amen.
ReplyDeleteWeak defense
ReplyDeleteShe is as%xual yet she got married and birthed 3 children. IMO her s%xual orientation claim is an attempt to attract sympathy.
ReplyDeleteI wonder too. Or the asexual feeling came when she was through with birthing her kids?
DeleteCould it be she used the man to birth her kids? If so, the man is the victim here period.
Exactly, I don't know who gave her that advise. Her parent are most likely not in support of her action, seeing as one of her parent is a judge yet she chose to come use the judiciary system in canada.
DeleteSome of us don’t know, understand or accept that we are asexual until years of research and awareness, now it made sense why I was never relationship oriented or get carried by six pack. I was more career oriented, tried sex for the first time at almost 30 years old out of curiosity and was disappointed, sharing body fluid with another human being was disgusting to me, married hubby because he is a good man and loves me to the heavens and at least I don’t feel disgusted having sex with him, just don’t enjoy it, never understand how one will have strong emotions for another adult order than children. I had 4 kids in 6 years so I can get child bearing out of the way and focus on raising them and my career that brings me joy. Hubby knew I do not enjoy sex because we had it before marriage, I allowed it so he will know what he is in for, my case is so bad that I cannot even fake it, why he went with the marriage beats me but I know deep down he loves me and to my knowledge has never cheated, the feelings I have for him is the closest I will ever come to love. I do not deny him sex when he wants it, secretly will not mind if he seeks his pleasure outside as long as he is discreet, that will even relieve me of the chore of sex.
DeleteI envy people who enjoy sex and would have loved to experience true sexual gratification but I know that will never happen for me. I am grateful for the other things I have( family, career, wealth beyond my dreams..), so I consider myself truly blessed.
So there are people that have never enjoyed sex or have the feeling of love? Wooow
DeleteEven the way you’re talking, it’s obvious you need regular orgasms to loosen up. You will never remain the same I promise
DeleteAnon. You promise. who send you?
DeleteCouples should always try to co-parent for the sake of the children na
ReplyDeleteBad lawyer. The case was quite weak but the lawyer was worse.
ReplyDelete🚶🚶♂️🚶♀️
ReplyDeleteHmmmmmmmm
ReplyDeletePoor kids!
ReplyDelete