Where are the Lawyers in the house?This should be Interesting!
She served time before for a crime she did not commit....Hmmmmmm
Sunday, April 12, 2020
Crime And Judgement!
Where are the Lawyers in the house?This should be Interesting!
She served time before for a crime she did not commit....Hmmmmmm
37 comments:
Disclaimer: Comments And Opinions On Any Part Of This Website Are Opinions Of The Blog Commenters Or Anonymous Persons And They Do Not Represent The Opinion Of StellaDimokoKorkus.com
Pictures and culled stories posted on this site are given credit and if a story is yours but credited to the wrong source,Please contact Stelladimokokorkus.com and corrections will be made..
If you have a complaint or a story,Please Contact StellaDimokoKorkus.com Via
Sdimokokorkus@gmail.com
Mobile Phone +4915210724141
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That is double jeopardy is she is imprisoned again for same crime.
ReplyDeleteThe man is now truly dead.😊😊😊
It's a case of going to buy something from a store and you are being owed a "change"...
DeleteSo you either collect your full balance or you take another thing to complete the transaction;or you gift the cashier(which is not doing anything to her husband)..
@MARTINS
One thing I learnt watching Italian movies , No body, No crime.
DeleteAs for dis case, she already did the time
If I were the judge I will set her free with immediate alacrity she can't pay for the same crime twice. The adulterous man can now burn in hell forever.
DeleteNothing like double jeopardy here. You guys are misapplying the rules
DeleteDouble jeopardy. She already serve the time so no more prison.
DeleteCompensate her for wrongful imprisonment and send her back to jail.
ReplyDeleteMy thoughts exactly
DeleteI am with you
DeleteHere to read and learn
ReplyDeleteI reserve my comments because I don't know what I will do if I were her.
ReplyDeleteHappy Easter blog fam.
She will be charged cos it's a fresh murder case..meanwhile she should be compensated for the wasted time for the former cos she wasn't guilty
ReplyDeleteIn law, it’s called double jeopardy, nobody’s going to try her for the same offense. The bastard can as well rot in hell, he deserves more than a lead in the head
ReplyDeleteGod bless you anon👍👍👍👍
DeleteAre you saying that she would be freed? If so, good judgement. The man is evil, the same with the woman he married
DeleteAbeg free the woman.
ReplyDeleteDepends on the country where it happened. Some countries have the "Double Jeopardy" law where you can't be convicted twice for the same crime. When she was sentenced the first time, she was being "owed" the crime so all she did after actually committing the crime was collecting.
ReplyDeleteThis your owing and collecting got me 😀😀
DeleteYeah, you are right. She can't be charged twice for the same crime.
DeleteShe already served her prison time.
ReplyDeleteSomeone just watched the movie Double Jeopardy.
ReplyDeleteLol
😁I want to agree with you. This stay at home has given folks plenty idle time.
DeleteIn the U.S it is called Double Jeopardy, you cannot rearrest for a crime that the person was acquitted or served time for. Let her go, he got what he deserved. How dare him put her through hell for another woman!
DeleteTale of a scorned woman.
ReplyDeleteWith an unforgiving spirit, I would do the same and damn the consequence. But she should have sued the govt/court and be compensated for going to jail.
She's going back to jail,why not report the man instead of killing.
ReplyDeleteMurder is murder,this one is not even premeditated murder because she didn't hire someone to shoot,she did it herself,don't know about the compensation though.
You don't know what premeditated murder is with your I too know.... Madam vertu
DeleteThe legal principle of double jeopardy prevents an accused person in a criminal matter from facing prosecution more than once for the same offence. The Latin maxim is "estoppel per rem judicatam". As long as she was prosecuted, convicted and even served punishment for the offence. She can NEVER be re-prosecuted.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't matter that she was wrongly convicted. The unfortunate man whom she has now killed for real, is the same man she was convicted of killing. Killing him now only goes to a question of morality and not legality. As offensive as it may seem, she cannot face criminal charges. The worse case scenario is, now that she has actually murdered her husband, she can no longer sue for wrongful conviction and incarceration. She cannot be compensated by the state anymore.
In America it's part of the 5th amendment to the Constitution. The law of double jeopardy is also taken very seriously in the criminal law of England and Wales. Even after a person has been acquitted of a criminal offence and he/she announces right there in court " look guys, I actually killed the deceased", he/she can't be prosecuted again. It's that serious.
In Nigerian criminal law, the defence known as " autrefois acquit" and "autrefois convict" is a peremptory plea that the accused person has already been acquitted or convicted of the same crime he is being charged with. The court is therefore estopped from further hearing the charge. This is the position of the law. There are a few exceptions to this law, like where the original charge was withdrawn or the charge dismissed not on the merits.
Damn! You’re a genius
DeleteSo can she be charged for civil wrong?
Delete@khaleesi, thanks for the compliment, darling.
Delete@olakunbi, there's no civil wrong here, cold blooded murder which is murder in the first degree, cannot translate into a civil wrong simpliciter. Most people who sue for wrongful death, a civil matter, are the families of the deceased who couldn't get the satisfaction of a criminal conviction. So if, for whatever reason, the person accused of murder is acquitted, the family of the deceased can seek civil litigation for wrongful death. In the instant case, it is not applicable, she has already been convicted of murdering her husband. There must be an end to litigation. That ship has sailed and isn't returning to dock anytime soon.
Though she shouldn't have killed him but now that she has,she shouldn't be arrested cos after all the man is dead accordingtoathe law of the land. What if the woman had been kiled for the assumed killing of his wife? Serves him right. He's such a heartless man n deserves real death.
ReplyDeleteThis defence of double jeopardy won't suffice here. This case falls under an exception to the plea of double jeopardy. An individual can be tried twice based on the same facts as long as the elements of each crime are different.
ReplyDeleteHer ass would be thrown into jail where she belongs. She should have sued and gotten compensation, "and maybe gotten a professional to do the HIT job if she must".. no be everything dem dey use gra gra and emotions solve. A little logic would have gone a long way here.
Happy Easter fam. Stay safe
Shut up n carry ur famzing, smelling self back to NSG blog. Bitter human
DeleteI don’t quite agree with you Dante
DeleteYou cant serve jail time twice for a single crime
ReplyDeleteits called double jeopardy and since he has been presumed dead before, he will rest in peace for real now😁
Lol. I Dey tell you. Bastard of a husband 😏
DeleteShe will definitely be arrested and charged, if not for murder then manslaughter or something else. She definitely won't go free.
ReplyDelete