An Alabama judge encouraged defendants who could not pay court fines to donate blood rather than spending time in jail, a US civil rights group has said.
"If you do not have any money and you don't want to go to jail, consider giving blood today," Judge Marvin Wiggins said in a recording released by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
Judge Wiggins (right) is the subject of an ethics complaint |
Some of the 500 defendants gave blood to avoid jail, but their debt remained.
The practice violates the US Constitution, legal experts said.
Judge Wiggins declined to comment on the allegations when contacted by the New York Times.
"Far too often in Alabama, we find that your legal rights are tied to your bank account," Sara Zampierin, a staff attorney in SPLC's Montgomery, Alabama, office said in a statement on Tuesday.
"It's a two-tiered system of justice - one for those who can pay and another for those who can't. We must stop exploiting the poor."
Ms Zampierin said her organisation has filed an ethics complaint against Judge Wiggins, who has served as a circuit judge in rural Perry County since 1999.
"What happened is wrong in about 3,000 ways," said Arthur Caplan, a professor of medical ethics at New York University, told the New York Times. "You're basically sentencing someone to an invasive procedure that doesn't benefit them and isn't protecting the public health."
In court on 17 September, the defendants were charged with a wide-range of crimes including hunting after dark, assault and drug possession.
The hearing was part of an aggressive effort by Alabama to collect on outstanding fines, restitution, court costs and lawyer fees.
Donations not used
The large legal fees and debts that some defendants incur in the US criminal justice system have received renewed attention recently.
This year a US Department of Justice report on the legal system in Ferguson, Missouri found widespread abuse. Investigators said officials unfairly targeted poor residents with fines in an effort to raise revenue for the town.
LifeSouth, the blood bank the court gave the samples to, eventually discarded nearly all of the blood units collected.
LifeSouth said it prohibits donations like the court's because the donors were offered "potentially an unacceptable incentive".
BBC Report.
Very interesting
ReplyDeleteLord have mercy on me o! Please you people should pray for me. I am finished! I just discovered my husband is having an affair with a married woman and they were not even using protection. Possible chain of std's. I am still breastfeeding my child, what if we have gotten HIV? God forbid!!!
ReplyDeletePlease someone should help me with a list of std tests. I don't deserve this kind of betrayal. God where are you?
Just go the general hospital and do the necessary test fast especially since ur breastfeeding.
DeleteSory dearie
DeleteJust go to a good clinic and explain yourself to a doctor. He would recommend various test for you to do. Goodluck. When dem say make una pray be4 sex una laugh u see am now.
DeleteMadam, face ur dh. Leave this woman alone. U that prayed, what did u achieve? Hypocrite
DeleteAnon 9.07.. pls enlighten me.. if she had prayed b4 sex it wld stop the husband frm cheating??
DeleteThat's crazy,what if someone isn't healthy enough to give blood?
ReplyDeletePart of 'Community Service' I guess!!!
ReplyDeleteGhanaman signing out!!!
Na was ooo. This is absurd.
ReplyDeleteDonate blood for jail time, sounds weird
ReplyDeleteBlood donation should be voluntary abeg.. maka why... m sure most of the blood wld be infected sef.. why dem no go throway am..
ReplyDeleteI believe this is a good idea for so many. Reasons
Delete1. It will encourage people to be careful with their health (because their. Freedom may depend on it)
2. People may rob others and pay bail but with blood? You go pay by yourself
3, by the time you remember Wetin go comot for your body, you will think twice